Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

Collapse

Ad Widget

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

    .... Disneyland on the Internet?

    Since Disney owns the underlying copyrights of most pictures taken at Disneyland, I was wondering if anyone has been approached by the company regarding the publishing of some of these images to the Web.

  • #2
    Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

    Yes, but mostly those are the pictures that were leaked out or are concept art or something like that.
    -Bill

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

      they don't own copyright on photos you take.

      Don't confuse their ownership of their likeness and properties with them owning the copyright to photos you take.

      Besides... even if you were to publish disney owned photos - two words for you 'fair use'.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

        Originally posted by flynnibus View Post
        they don't own copyright on photos you take.

        Don't confuse their ownership of their likeness and properties with them owning the copyright to photos you take.

        Besides... even if you were to publish disney owned photos - two words for you 'fair use'.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

          I think if anything, publishing these photos here helps Disney. When we see a trip report, we are inspired to visit the parks, stay at their hotels and buy their meals and souvenirs.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

            Again.. these are not copyright issues - they are property law issues.

            A private entity has authority to restrict or grant access to their possessions.

            Disney's biggest concern is the use of their likeness outside of their control.

            Photos of the HM are not copyright issues - and when it comes to reproducing other copyrighted material (as often is done here for illustration) its done under the pretenses of review, criticism, news, etc.. where Fair-Use (when used with several tests) could easily be argued.

            But again in the context of this thread.. 'backstage' photos are not copyright issues when it comes to you posting photos you took yourself. They are property-law issues because of taking the photos of private property on private property without the consent of the owner.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

              If someone was selling photos of famous locations in Disney then they'll object. They're not going to object to someone posting their trip to Disney however.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

                ^^ Beat me to it. No one here is making money off these things (I know I'm not) and are doing nothing more than piquing others' interest in going to the Parks.

                What's the harm??
                How much do we have to pay to get MiceChat Old?
                :monkey: :monkey:

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

                  Originally posted by PragmaticIdealist View Post
                  .... Disneyland on the Internet?

                  Since Disney owns the underlying copyrights of most pictures taken at Disneyland, I was wondering if anyone has been approached by the company regarding the publishing of some of these images to the Web.
                  Mickey is a copywritten character, also a trademark for the Disney corporation. Your theory is that Disney owns every photo taken of a child with Mickey?

                  Wrong. I don't have the legal background to argue the point, but common sense says its wrong.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

                    I could be wrong, but I understood that when in something like an amusement park, photos taken inside may not be sold without a property release. But, if I stood across the street and took a photo of say a coaster, that's fair game since I was not on property when the photo was taken. Can anyone confirm/deny this?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

                      I know several CM's and former CM's including myself who have been contacted and confronted by Management for leaking information, backstage photos, and things like that... but not pictures.
                      "Happiness is a Low Water Level"

                      sigpic

                      "Creating magical memories and making Managers cry since 1955!"

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

                        Ok, I've had to study law regarding photo copyrights -- have a book or two on this too for backup if I need that later.

                        Basically, we are not talking about property laws AT ALL. This is pure copyright protection. All copyrights for architectural purposes will give case-by-case instances on what you can and how you can photograph anything. For example, if you take a photo of the Eiffel Tower in Paris, France during the day, you can do whatever you want. But when the lights are turned out, no photography allowed that will break copyrights (due to restrictions on the light show). Ask permission or get in trouble. Most rules for architecture and photography of other copyrighted works are the same: no photographs may be taken of the copyrighted subject for commercial use without prior approval unless the copyrighted subject is not the focus of the photograph. i.e. A photograph of the New York City skyline is alright to make a profit on, but a photograph of the Empire State Building is not.

                        The basics for Disney Parks are no photography of their architecture or characters or anything within can be sold for a profit without prior permission. You may take photos of the castle for your scrap book, but you may not take photos of the castle to sell at your gallery. There are confidentiality and integrity restrictions in place, too, so if there's a cease and desist about a photo, it's showing restricted areas that are designated as no photo zones. I could even see them going after a photo that might show illegal activity that could be misinterpreted and could go in the area of libel.

                        Photographs of the parks that could be free of the copyright restrictions would be hard to come by. In fact, might need to go into some aerial photography where the park isn't the main subject to be able to do something like that.
                        -Tim

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

                          You can not copyright a building.

                          Only, iterary, musical, or artistic work

                          New designs all the time! Click the banner to see all the designs and colors!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

                            Originally posted by FrumiousBoojum View Post
                            Ok, I've had to study law regarding photo copyrights -- have a book or two on this too for backup if I need that later.

                            Basically, we are not talking about property laws AT ALL. This is pure copyright protection. All copyrights for architectural purposes will give case-by-case instances on what you can and how you can photograph anything.
                            But the thought that spurred this thread is the 'backstage photo' thread. I don't own a copyright at all on the inside of my house, but I can prevent you from taking photos in there - and its got nothing to do with copyright, because I didn't create any of it. It's just that its my personal property.

                            Disney doesn't have a copyright on a steel shed, but they can prevent you from taking photos of it on their private property.

                            Are you trying to say Disney has copyrights on trucks, boxes, and regular construction methods? That's just not the case. There needs to be something artistic, unique or creative about the material to be copyrighted. I can't copyright generic things.

                            Originally posted by FrumiousBoojum View Post
                            For example, if you take a photo of the Eiffel Tower in Paris, France during the day, you can do whatever you want. But when the lights are turned out, no photography allowed that will break copyrights (due to restrictions on the light show).
                            That's probably because its considered a 'performance'. Just because something is performed in public does not gauruntee free license to it (for instance, giving a speech in public does not relinquish your copyright on the contents of that speech). Your building can not be copyrighted daylight vs evening - your example has got to be based on the concept that the lights are part of a show or performance.

                            Originally posted by FrumiousBoojum View Post
                            Most rules for architecture and photography of other copyrighted works are the same: no photographs may be taken of the copyrighted subject for commercial use without prior approval unless the copyrighted subject is not the focus of the photograph. i.e. A photograph of the New York City skyline is alright to make a profit on, but a photograph of the Empire State Building is not.
                            I do not think you are talking about copyright law (which is federal law) but rather the idea of right-of-publicity (or right to privacy), which allows you to control how your likeness or identity is commercially used. Things like the castle are identity elements of Disney, and they would fight anyone trying to use that image commercially.

                            Originally posted by FrumiousBoojum View Post
                            There are confidentiality and integrity restrictions in place, too, so if there's a cease and desist about a photo, it's showing restricted areas that are designated as no photo zones
                            See.. that's where the argument falls down. Copyright law has nothing to do with 'no photo zones' or restricting where people can and can not take photos. There is no basis there to say 'you can take a photo here, but not there'.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Has Anyone on MiceChat Been Told to Cease and Desist Publishing Pictures of....

                              To answer the original question,..........no.
                              sigpic

                              This has been a Filmways presentation dahling.

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X