Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Disney Makes CGI Prequel to Peter Pan

Collapse

Ad Widget

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Disney Makes CGI Prequel to Peter Pan

    RT-News writes: "Disney will make a CGI prequel to the Peter Pan story, Variety reports. "Peter and the Starcatchers," a bestselling children's book by Dave Barry and Ridley Pearson, tells the story of Peter leading an effort to recover a truck of magic "starstuff" before a pirate gets his hands on it."
    I don't know about this one! :confused:

    Disney will also be making sequels to Monsters Inc., Toy Story, and The Incredibles...

    I feel even WORSE about that!

  • #2
    Originally posted by Soulquarian
    I don't know about this one! :confused:

    Disney will also be making sequels to Monsters Inc., Toy Story, and The Incredibles...

    I feel even WORSE about that!
    I think Disney is less inclined to make sequels because is the Movie is successful they have to fire that person. Instead they'd rather ruin franchises they already own.












    Comment


    • #3
      That's just horrid. Disney has not made a decent animated film without Pixar since Lio & Stitch. And that wasn't even all that great. No they will continue to thrive off the success of Pixar's films using their crappy animation studio. That's just horrible. I do not trust Disney's 3D animation. Dionasoaur was hidious, and this chicken movie looks less then aplealing. I say it's just time to hang it up and focus on their liove action market.

      Comment


      • #4
        This is just dumb.

        Comment


        • #5
          STOP! Just stop! Come up with some new ideas, ideas of your own. Bring the musiic back, and for god's sake, bring the anamation back. That CGI crap they have sucks.
          Anyone up for a Colorado Micechatters meet-up?
          http://micechat.com/forums/meets-eve...ml#post3486518


          Colorado Micechatter Extrordinare!
          sigpic

          Comment


          • #6
            Sad. Just sad.
            Eglantine, Eglantine, oh how you shine!
            I don't believe in giving animals ridiculous names. I call him Cosmic Creepers...
            ...and if you've got no other choice, you know you can follow my voice...

            Comment


            • #7
              Nooooooooo!!!!
              disneyphile@gmail.com

              Comment


              • #8
                Has anybody read the book that it's based on? It's not even from the orginal author. It's written by Dave Berry who I think is only half as funny as he believes he is. I'd heard about it before, but I didn't know it was going to be CG, even though I should have. Now that I know, I need to find a place to cry.
                "Do it for me then. Your gaming buddies are going to be there too. It will be good for you kids to go out and blow the stink off yourselves for one night."

                "Fine. For you. And for the eradication of stink."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Tell me when you find that place. I'd like to use it when youre through.
                  Anyone up for a Colorado Micechatters meet-up?
                  http://micechat.com/forums/meets-eve...ml#post3486518


                  Colorado Micechatter Extrordinare!
                  sigpic

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by IndyJn511
                    STOP! Just stop! Come up with some new ideas, ideas of your own. Bring the musiic back, and for god's sake, bring the anamation back. That CGI crap they have sucks.
                    Yes, Please!!! For the love of all that's good and right!
                    Marge: Barnacle Bill's Home Pregnancy Test? Homer, shouldn't we have gone with a better-known brand?
                    Homer: But Marge, this one came with a corn-cob pipe!
                    Marge: [reading from the test box] "Ahoy, Maties! If the water turns blue, a baby for you! If purple ye see, no baby thar be!"
                    Homer: So, which is it? Blue or purple?
                    Marge: Pink.
                    Homer: D'oh!
                    Marge: "If ye test should fail, to a doctor set sail!"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm gonna have to go against the tide of opinion here. I haven't read the book off which they're basing it, but IMHO just because it's a sequel or a prequel or whatever doesn't necessarily make it bad. What will determine my opinion on it is how they go about it. I think it's an interesting concept, and I'll be interested to see how it pans out! (pun intended)
                      "I don't need intelligent drugs because I don't know what they are. But I will put anything into my mouth that is given to me, whether it's supposed to go there or not. Because... I'm different."

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        *gets out guns*

                        remembers this is done on computers...

                        *gets out buddies laptop and writes new code for new "eisner" bugg.....*

                        Now what did they say about these "sequels" and "prequel" they dont exist right.... *keeps hand near launch button..*

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          "Back in the '30s The Three Little Pigs was an enormous hit, and the cry went up - 'Give us more pigs!' I could not see how we could possibly top pigs with pigs. But we tried, and I doubt whether any one of you reading this can name the other cartoons in which the pigs appeared."

                          --- Walt Disney

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            They are calling it "Return to Neverland Ranch" :devil:
                            "As usual he's taken over the coolest spot in the house"- Father re: Orville 1963

                            [FONT=Arial Narrow]

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Oh, jeeze, did it have to be CG though? I would've been fairly fine with the concept but CG? Ugh. Look how Mickey's Twice Upon A Christmas turned out! So, you're telling me we're gonna see the poor quality of cheap animation in theaters while using an un-necessary prequel?
                              Give me a break, Eisner.
                              I lurk.

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X