Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Disney Seeks Emergency Stay of Judge's Order on 3D Movie Conversions

Collapse

Ad Widget

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Disney Seeks Emergency Stay of Judge's Order on 3D Movie Conversions

    Walt Disney Studios has filed an emergency motion in federal court looking to stay a recent ruling by the judge handling the bankruptcy of Digital Domain Media Group. At stake might be Disney's ability to create 3D movies without fear of being sued for patent infringement.


    Digital Domain was the visual effects studio co-founded by James Cameron in 1993. In September, after declaring bankruptcy, most of the company's assets were sold out of bankruptcy to Galloping Horse America and Reliance MediaWorks for $30.2 million.

    But parent DDMG still has significant debts and has sought to auction off some of its remaining assets for the benefit of its creditors. Among the most prized remaining assets is patents relating to the 2D-to-3D conversion processes, which DDMG acquired when it purchased 3D stereo studio In-Three in late 2010.

    The prospect of the patents being sold has caused concern in Hollywood. Marvel sought to protect rights related to The Avengers and Lucasfilm sought to protect The Nightmare Before Christmas. But it was Disney who expressed the loudest objection, contending that the proposed sale could impair its rights to distribute such films as G-Force, Alice in Wonderland and Tron Legacy.

    In December, Delaware bankruptcy judgeBrendan Linehan Shannon approved the patent sale with certain stipulations. The judge also addressed Disney's concerns with a specially directed ruling concerning the company.

    In his ruling, Judge Shannon summed up the dispute this way: "Does the G-Force Agreement operate to grant Disney a right to use the In-Three Patents on a going forward basis? And to put a finer point on it, for purposes of the Debtor's Sale Motion, will whoever buys the In-Three Patents from the Debtor be required to permit Disney to use that technology, gratis, in perpetuity?"

    The answers, say the judge, are, "No."

    The judge concluded that Disney enjoyed a limited license to the patents and could rest easy that it wouldn't be sued over Alice in Wonderland and G-Force. But the judge also decided that Disney hadn't exercised an option under the G-Force Agreement for a perpetual license and that there was "no contractual privity between Disney and the Debtor that would enable Disney to enforce the G-Force Agreement against the Debtor."

    The covenant not to sue applied to films that had been made under the original agreement, the judge ruled, not those that had yet to come. Disney's objection to the asset sale was thus overruled.


    On Wednesday, Disney brought the matter to a Delaware federal court to gain time for further review, arguing that "the Debtors' interest in patents they purchased are subject to and limited by pre-existing licenses, thereby requiring that any subsequent sale of such patents in bankruptcy remain subject to such pre-existing licenses."

    Disney says that without opportunity for a meaningful appellate review, it "will suffer ongoing harm -- the risk of being sued on account of alleged acts of infringement committed by third-party vendors on future film projects and of being denied the right to practice the In-Three Patents themselves -- in an amount that is impossible to ascertain currently."

    full story at:
    Disney Seeks Emergency Stay of Judge's Order on 3D Movie Conversions - Hollywood Reporter
    "If you don't know how to draw, you don't belong in this building" - John Lasseter 2006

  • #2
    Re: Disney Seeks Emergency Stay of Judge's Order on 3D Movie Conversions

    They have to speak up - If the purchasers want to be Patent Trolls they could tie Disney and the other studios in knots - Throw away all the work they did under the license, or pay Greenmail to reissue that 3D movie on Blu-Ray.

    So the bigger question not asked: Why didn't Disney (or another movie studio) buy the companies patents out of Bankruptcy Court themselves? They have the scratch to do it...
    There's No Place Like 127.0.0.1

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Disney Seeks Emergency Stay of Judge's Order on 3D Movie Conversions

      Originally posted by Bruce Bergman View Post
      So the bigger question not asked: Why didn't Disney (or another movie studio) buy the companies patents out of Bankruptcy Court themselves? They have the scratch to do it...
      An auction was approved by the bankruptcy judge so all are awaiting for it to go forward or to be somehow avoided by a new ruling.
      "If you don't know how to draw, you don't belong in this building" - John Lasseter 2006

      Comment

      Ad Widget

      Collapse
      Working...
      X