Announcement

Collapse

MiceChat Rules

A list of MiceChat's rules can be found at the top of the Disneyland forum.
See more
See less

Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

Collapse

Header Ad

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • [Chat] Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

    I think that she should a permanent character at both parks. We are months from the release of the Enchanted DVD and of course there's the debate on whether she's a 'true' princess or not even though Disney is marketing her as a princess.

    But she could be a great face character in her green 'curtain dress' walking around Fantasyland. What are your thoughts?
    56
    Yes
    69.64%
    39
    No
    30.36%
    17

    The poll is expired.

    sigpic
    Home away from Home.

  • #2
    Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

    YES I DO.

    But didn't Amy Adams sign something saying they couldn't use her in the parks?

    Cammie Dog: 3/27/05-6/28/09 God took you way too soon Protect your dog from heat stroke. It attacks and kills quickly.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

      I'm saying no. It'd be nice to have her for a few years but permanent, not so much.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

        Idk.... it might not be too bad of an idea. If they're gonna keep the PPF around for a long while, she'd probably fit in there nicely. Maybe keep her out of parades for now, though.






        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

          In the curtain dress, not the wedding dress.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

            Originally posted by Dreamer20k View Post
            YES I DO.

            But didn't Amy Adams sign something saying they couldn't use her in the parks?
            maybe, but wouldnt the character be represented in the parks and not Amy Adams? Ehh its weird legal stuff i dont get


            SUPPORT THE CMs

            sigpic
            For me, Tomorrow is everyday...wait...what?

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

              Enchanted is tricky because animated Giselle is clearly based off Amy Adams. That brings up all sorts of legal issues(such as paying Adams royalties) when they use her "likeness" in the parks. I've read that they're not marketing Giselle as part of the princesses precisely because if they were to do so, they would have to pay Adams royalties.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

                Originally posted by Alice's Wonderland View Post
                In the curtain dress, not the wedding dress.
                I agree
                Oo-de-lally, Oo-de-lally
                Golly, what a day

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

                  I've no idea of the legal issues, but I love Giselle and would be very happy to see her in the park, and also part of a parade where "That's How You Know" is performed.
                  sigpic
                  If you can keep your head when all around you have lost theirs, then you probably haven't understood the seriousness of the situation.
                  http://www.flickr.com/photos/blendywee

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

                    This will never happen. Amy Adams' contract with Disney is written up so that every time Giselle is in the park, she gets a royalty.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

                      This has always bugged me...

                      Giselle IS NOT A PRINCESS!!!!

                      She never married the prince and at the beginning of the film she wasn't a princess.

                      http://dlrtoday.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

                        I still think they should have Princess Nancy there.
                        For certain you must be lost to find the places that can't be found. Elseways, everyone would know where it was.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

                          No, Giselle should stay away from the park.
                          "You are watching FOX"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

                            Originally posted by MysticalSkye View Post
                            I still think they should have Princess Nancy there.
                            At least she's legit!

                            http://dlrtoday.com

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Should Giselle be a permanent character at the parks?

                              Yeah Giselle isn't a princess, but she should still be represented somewhere in the park, Disney has enough money to pay Amy Adams royalties for her character to appear in the park. I think the whole Princess Nancy thing would be cute but I don't know if enough kids would pick up on who she was since she wasn't as big of a character of Giselle.

                              Comment

                              Unconfigured Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X