Inspired by another thread-
I have been on Indy several times, but my daughter is still too small to go on the ride- yet when I took her to WDW last year when she was 4 and a half she was big enough to go on Dinosaur. I understand that the ride systems are the same- and Dinosaur was by no means a gentle ride.
It makes no sense for her to be too small for one and big enough for the other- it certainly is not an attempt to edit content because Dinosaur was IMO potentially more frightening that Indy is.
I also do not get why three year olds can go on DL's Space Mountain (I suppose that could change with the refurb) but the WDW has a height requirement that Rose barely met when we went. It turned out to be one of her favorite rides but it still makes little sense to me.
Does anyone else have opinion or insight on this?
I have been on Indy several times, but my daughter is still too small to go on the ride- yet when I took her to WDW last year when she was 4 and a half she was big enough to go on Dinosaur. I understand that the ride systems are the same- and Dinosaur was by no means a gentle ride.
It makes no sense for her to be too small for one and big enough for the other- it certainly is not an attempt to edit content because Dinosaur was IMO potentially more frightening that Indy is.
I also do not get why three year olds can go on DL's Space Mountain (I suppose that could change with the refurb) but the WDW has a height requirement that Rose barely met when we went. It turned out to be one of her favorite rides but it still makes little sense to me.
Does anyone else have opinion or insight on this?
Comment