Announcement

Collapse

Gumball Rally 2018

Tickets are selling fast! Act now to reserve your spot. http://micechat.com/events/rally
See more
See less

Can Disney's California Adventure Be Fixed?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Wotan
      What should they do?

      Change the name. The park is neither an adventure, or much about California (Where *is* the Hollywood sign in that park? Or the redwoods?)

      Dynamite Paradise Pier. Get rid of the entire carnival atmosphere. How is that related to California?
      you realize a name change would only confound and confuse most people (especialy since the park would not be reopend as an entirly new experience in one day) as far as the Hollywood sign goes I believe that it is copywrited and Disney did not want to be constantly paying a fee to have it in their park, I have no idea about the redwoods really

      Paradise Pier is relativly fine as far as tourists go (mostly hardcore fans are going to hate it but it looks nice at night) Disney would do better to add in some themeing to make it look more turn of the century (or perhaps recently refurbished turn of the centurey) less modern crud though, then they should add my mermaid darkride to give the area a magical feel

      as far as the Pier relating to California goes California used to have alot of ocean side theme parks and Paradise Pier is just trying to capture that feeling (my dad talks about one he used to go to all the time as a kid growing up in California)

      Originally posted by Wotan
      It needs two more E-tickets. Put people on Aladdin's flying carpets with Robin Williams' Genie. Move in a copy of Mickey's Philharmagic (and let's face it, sooner or later, they're going to bring that here).

      The animation exhibit just isn't bringing people in. It's got to be reworked.

      DCA needs more then two E-tickets and we will see them added on throughout the coming years

      Aladdin's magic carpets would be a horrid addition to DCA as it would NOT match the theme (it's already a disgrace in DSP and was a last second addition to that park, it's designed for Adventureland you realize, I suppose Disneyland could update their adventureland entrance with it so that there would be two spinners in the hub... ugh that orbiter really needs to move up onto the platform like WDW's)

      Philharmagic isn't really needed anytime soon (DCA has movie based attractions coming out it's EARS) maybe in a few years but honestly DCA needs rides and things that are well thought out not quick patches

      as far as reworking animation goes as of right now DCA has the best version of Animation in existance (WDW killed off the real animators deal and DSP has the poor man's version of what DCA has) I suppose if you really wanted to add something to it you could merge it with Philharmagic and make it combination Animation exibit and Philharmagic 3D attraction
      "We all have sparks, imagination! it's how our minds... create creations!"

      Comment


      • #33
        How about this e-ticket idea for DCA?

        Not that it would ever happen, but if anything is about dreams, it's Disney...

        What if WDI was to take the technology of Epcot Test Track (not the ride, just the high speed vehicle tech) and apply it to a ride where it took visitors on a fast trip down selected parts of the Pacific Coast Highway?

        Certainly there's enough scenery, twists and curves (add bird effects, seals and sea lions, cross a waterfall, sunset on the beach), etc to make it a compelling, and California-related ride.

        Note--I didn't know they'd already tried Aladdin. Given the lack of e-ticket space across the plaza, though, what other ideas do folks have for a completely new, $10 million-dollar-ticket E-ticket for DCA?

        Comment


        • #34
          If I had the unfortunate job of trying to clean up the DCA debacle i would deep six every possible reference of "DCA or Disney's California Adventure"

          For the interim just let it be known as a part of Disneyland, no reference of any other name than it being a part of DL (or Eisner) and then...

          Remove all the tacky carny rides...

          Plants trees! more trees! live trees, fiberglas trees! clothes trees!

          And then do an extensive guest survey of what they want.
          Micechat member # 98

          TARDIS
          "Time And Relative Dimension In Space."

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Wotan
            Not that it would ever happen, but if anything is about dreams, it's Disney...

            What if WDI was to take the technology of Epcot Test Track (not the ride, just the high speed vehicle tech) and apply it to a ride where it took visitors on a fast trip down selected parts of the Pacific Coast Highway?

            Certainly there's enough scenery, twists and curves (add bird effects, seals and sea lions, cross a waterfall, sunset on the beach), etc to make it a compelling, and California-related ride.

            Note--I didn't know they'd already tried Aladdin. Given the lack of e-ticket space across the plaza, though, what other ideas do folks have for a completely new, $10 million-dollar-ticket E-ticket for DCA?
            actualy from what I've been hearing from sources over at MouseInfo, we may be looking at a new Eticket in 2007 that uses the Test Track ride system (this was dirived from the clues given that it would be the fastest ride at the resort and would use a ride system found at two other disney parks *Journy to the Center of the Earth and Test Track are they same ride system* and also that it's theme may have something to do with an upcoming pixar film )

            and if you'll check out the expansion room they've got in my LA expansion plan (I put a link on the first page of this thread) you'll see how much room DCA really has to expand

            if they use the space correctly it can go a long way (note that the LA expansion thing I drew up is scaled to the approximate size of the Space Mountain area in DLR)
            "We all have sparks, imagination! it's how our minds... create creations!"

            Comment


            • #36
              I think that an expanded Bay Area behind the Pacific Wharf restaurants could be home to:
              1. The Streets of San Francsico - a simulation car chase through the winding and steep streets of SFO (remember Bullitt?)
              2. New Horizons - celebrating the silicon valley and a modern successor of the much-missed Horizons. Big on AA, low on thrills, and huge on space, so that may be a mediocre idea in the long run, but an idea nonetheless.

              Wasn't the San Francisco street supposed to have a place to see artists painting and sculpting?

              In Hollywood:
              1. For thrills, a Rockin' Roller Coaster, of perhaps a Jazz'n Roller Coaster, for the sake of originality
              2. A monoral station
              3. An American version of Cinemagique, replacing Hollywood and Dine.
              4. A new backlot stunt show - maybe a reworking of Lights, Camera, Chaos

              Comment


              • #37
                I just entertained a family from England. They really enjoyed DCA. If we compare it to Disneyland it will always fall short. Given time, money, and a little attention from the imaginears it can only get better. A day at DCA is still better then working! (that doesn't go for all you DCA CM'S)

                Comment


                • #38
                  (Note: Loooooong post ahead, but you asked what I'd do with the place...)

                  Theme is pretty limited without a berm, although I think critics have been too hard on a lack of DCA berm, since Disneyland, even though they planted trees, didn't have such a big berm at first, either!

                  I say: Drop the California theme, tear out all these movierides, and begin indentifying yourself as Disney's park for older people. Seriously, kick out the characters and get some steelies like, to name one park, Knott's, but for goodness sakes don't take the same designs they do (Maliboomer, argh!). Coasters don't need a berm, can't use one anyway. Ideally, they can get two regular coasters (one indoors, one outdoors) and one inventive outdoors one. Sell that Ferris Wheel and Chain Bucket because every park in the world has one of those and it'll only get in the way of your track. Keep Tower of Terror and Hyperion.

                  Take out any cheesy stuff like carny games. Yes, we're heading into Knott's and (to an extent) Six Flags territory, but we're going to do it elegantly. Rides won't be as broken down, the employees won't be as surly, the place won't look as junky as Six Flags Overflushing.

                  The hardest rides are in the back. From Hollywood, through A Bug's Land all the way up to Screamin'. We want to put these back there so that they don't wake up the Grand Californian or make too much noise in the Esplenade. Nothing but cheap burgers n' hot dogs are available around this side of the park, and certainly no alcohol, because we don't want it easy for someone to step into the life of a vomit comet with a brewski in their hand. All in all, this park has four coasters (our indoor coaster [RnR?], our outdoor coaster, Screamin, and our unique coaster) and a few thrill rides such as the rapids, Maliboomer, and Tower of Terror.

                  Since we want to draw more than coaster fanatics (you'll find out why below), make some reasons to go that are clearly designed at an older audience. Secure one of those highly-acclaimed Disney plays from Broadway and put it in the Hyperion. This show will cost admission, it is only available as packaged-in to your DCA ticket. There's a higher priced tier ticket to this park that includes going to see the show, and they check your park ticket at the door. A Park-Hopper + Show ticket will be advertised as the ultimate experience at the resort. While this will be more than the usual Park-Hopper, it won't be that much more, because nobody likes to spend that much money and find they have to spend even yet more to see EVERYTHING.

                  Over by the river rapids, we rehab the winery and the tortilla factory into some restaurant options that are a cut above the stuff served near the coaster lines. Alcohol is also served over here. Management is really big on the latino population right now, so one of these places should Mexican food as well as some traditional items with a south of the border twist.

                  Maybe you could put a dance club out by the lake (I don't know what the layout of the former Puck place looks like, but that kind of view over the water is what I'm thinking of.) This might be more of a nuisance, though, as that kind of atmosphere seems to invite drugs and violence. But if they could pull it off at WDW, they could pull off a smaller one here.

                  Here comes the elegant part that I was talking about before:

                  Lastly, where they currently have the McDonald's and the carny rides like the parachutes and the mad mouse and the climb-on boat that barely counts as an attraction, everything gets ripped up and a new weenie is built. This should be something unlike anything else in the theme parks division.The new weenie should have a restaurant inside it. Size-wise I'm not thinking of something as huge as a Space Needle here, more like the LAX theme building, I guess. Although it's been so many years since I've seen it I might be thinking it's smaller than it really is. If the weenie restaurant is high enough to see the fireworks coming from DL (see below) it would be nice, but that's not a priority.

                  The restaurant inside the weenie building serves gourmet-quality food and wine. Reservations are reccomended. On most nights, this restaurant is fancier than Blue Bayou but not as not as exclusive as Club 33. However, companies or any other group that can afford it can book far in advance (farther than individual customers can make reservations) to book the whole restaurant for a whole night. These bookings are very expensive and Club 33 level service and meals is expected.

                  The nationwide marketing for this park will have two themes that resonate with the same message. That Disneyland is a park for all members of the family, while this park is for the older members of the family.

                  One side of the marketing will be advertising the thrill rides and coasters. An older child, a teenager, or a young adult of the iPod Generation who normally roll their eyes and groan when told the whole family is going to Disney and they're expected to come should see these ads and want to go.

                  The other advertisement will be romantic and aimed at adults. A couple is spending a day at Disneyland. A quick montage shows them walking through the castle drawbridge, getting their picture taken with Mickey, riding on a Jungle Cruise boat. Suddently, a view of the Grand Californian at dusk. Our couple is in their room and getting ready for their special night, putting away the Goofy shirt and the Mickey Ears hat and putting on some nice (but not stuffy) clothes. They're next seen in the Hyperion watching the Broadway play as the announcer tells you that there's a whole new adult experience to be had at the Disneyland Resort, including a highly acclaimed Broadway show. The ad closes out with the phone number and "call for travel packages" pitch as our TV couple eats at the weenie restaurant. If it's up in the air, they see the fireworks launching from DL outside their window.

                  So, with all this you've attracted the following markets:

                  1. Families with older children
                  2. Thrill junkies
                  3. Couples/Romantics
                  4. West-coasters who want to see that quality musical that was getting rave reviews and think a trip to the ol' theme park would do them some good, too.
                  5. Corporate parties
                  6. And of course, the usual array of AP visitors and the tourists who came for Disneyland and are now wondering what's going on next door.

                  The only question is could the company do it? I think they could. If they could get Pleasure Island off the ground in WDW, they could certainly handle this as nothing here is any more adult-oriented than that is.

                  So, anybody like my idea? Hate it? Call me a blasphemer and sacrifice my skull at the temple of Disney tradition? What?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Been thinking about this for a while? :P
                    Best interview answer: My biggest weakness is my honesty...I can never remember my lies!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      You know, just given comparative lists of attractions, I think DCA on opening was a better park than DL on opening. I was certainly surprised by how much I didn't hate it when I finally went after a few years...I think the online Disney community is an echo chamber where the small details missing from DCA fester and seem to be more significant than they really are.

                      My boyfriend would actually rather spend time at DCA than DL. He prefers the theming (I know! he's mad) and likes that the place is less crowded, it's easier to get around, etc.

                      That said, I for one would like more emphasis on a centralized hub (and, yes, a new weenie) to add a focus to the park the second you walk in. A few years ago I had an idea for an attraction that would synthesize a bunch of the weird houses built (in CA obviously) by eccentric zillionaires (some combination of the more interesting features of Hearst Castle, the Winchester Mystery House, and a few others) which I think would do well. I wrote up the details someplace but I haven't got them here. I wanted to call it "Castle California" to tie in with an ad campaign that "now there are two castles at the Disneyland Resort"...start at SBC and then pan over slowly to the weird old house of DCA, with, you know, reproductions of Renaissance statues festooning the exterior, the Winchester spiderweb windows, etc. I think it would add a really interesting, eccentric flair to the park that would complement the whole mall atmosphere nicely. This could also be merged with some of the California history. I agree that the park could use more edutainment...I don't think you can appreciate California much at all without knowing its history. It would be cool to get someone from a travel book company involved in future developments. I think that the author of Lonely Planet California could tell WDI what people expect from a park about CA a lot better than the average CA native.

                      Okay, I've got to go to class. I like how many amateur Imagineers have crawled out of the woodwork for this one

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        California Adventure lacks the creativity, originality, and pride that imagineers used to display.The way I see it, if I'm going to go to Calif. to see Calif., I'll see the real stuff, but If I go to Disneyland I want to see the stuff dreams are made of. I think the park can be fixed however. I figure the best way to save California Adventure, is to rebuild. With the current rides, buildings, and potential expansion land, CA could be turned into a DisneySea park. Some of the rides already have a counterpart in Tokyo, ToT, Jumpin Jellyfish, etc. Other CA attractions could be modified, Soarin to match Lost River Delta, the entrance could even remain with a San Francisco theme, the possiblities are endless. With some imagination, and unfortunately lots of money, this park could be converted into a 5-star attraction in no time!
                        In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of fate.

                        DoppelV

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by kevdo
                          I'd retheme The Bay Area and Condor Flats areas to become a larger Grizzly Peak Recreation Area. With Soarin' this is very doable and I'd tear out the movie theatre in BA and replace it with some sort of "nature" themed ride.

                          For HPBL - use the space vacated by Millionaire, SSL, and Hollywood and Dine to build a new D or preferrably E ticket ride. Rockin' Roller Coaster might fit thematically. No, a Monsters Inc. overlay on SSL is not what the doctor ordered.

                          For Paradise Pier, I'd replace the Orange Stinger and Jumpin Jellyfish with something that either a) smaller kids can ride or b) something more exciting. Preferrably something that isn't a cycle ride. It might be cool to add some sort of boat ride on the lake.

                          Would love to see a Gold Rush themed POTC-type ride. Not sure where they could physically fit in the park (since it would thematically work best near Grizzly Peak).
                          I love those ideas. Especialy the POTC type ride. That could really be something with today's technology. As far as rockin' rollercoaster. It was reported on my board, a long while back, that when they installed the electric circuits (or whatever they are called) for tot, that they also installed enough for Rockin' Rollercoaster, or another large E ticket ride. Does anyone have info that confirms or denies this? If that is true then there may already be plans for another huge attraction in the works. Something original to DL would be better than another clone, but I'll take RR anyday!
                          Visit Disney Nuts today!

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            They should have the Monorail stop in DCA.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Niyxstyx
                              California Adventure lacks the creativity, originality, and pride that imagineers used to display.The way I see it, if I'm going to go to Calif. to see Calif., I'll see the real stuff, but If I go to Disneyland I want to see the stuff dreams are made of. I think the park can be fixed however. I figure the best way to save California Adventure, is to rebuild. With the current rides, buildings, and potential expansion land, CA could be turned into a DisneySea park. Some of the rides already have a counterpart in Tokyo, ToT, Jumpin Jellyfish, etc. Other CA attractions could be modified, Soarin to match Lost River Delta, the entrance could even remain with a San Francisco theme, the possiblities are endless. With some imagination, and unfortunately lots of money, this park could be converted into a 5-star attraction in no time!
                              no, Disney should save the DisneySea ideas for a third gate

                              if you tried to rebuild DCA into something totaly different like that you would end up with the park looking uglier and the whole theme would be conviluted

                              the best thing Disney can do is work through the California theme in some imaginative and exciting ways
                              "We all have sparks, imagination! it's how our minds... create creations!"

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I don't necessarily hate DCA but I don't love it either. One issue that just can't stand is the lack of shade. You have these enormous walk ways around the park with benches every what? Two feet :confused: but no shade. Maybe that will come in time who knows. It really annoys me. I can not stand the games area in Paradise Pier! They need to remove those ASAP.

                                I'm sure eventually the park will be fixed to a certain extent but it will never have the full "Disney magic" that other parks have. I just think it's too far gone. I will say this, they did a great job with the food I love the dinning choices at DCA much more then Disneyland.
                                Last edited by Disguy; 01-19-2005, 10:32 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X