Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Something interesting with Height Requirements

Collapse

Ad Widget

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Something interesting with Height Requirements


  • #2
    Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

    I wonder about some of them.
    Most kids can get on Space Mountain
    but you have to be taller to get onto Indy.
    I would think Indy would be easier to get on than Space.
    I think Space throws around a child more than Indy does.
    I think Screamin' has the tallest heigh requirement that all the rides.
    Quote by Al:
    To that end I'd like the Internet community to join me in reminding the Disney company that "it all started with Walt." As you can see below we've created some T-shirts, plus a few simple graphics that you can copy and paste into your websites to let folks know how you feel.
    -Al Lutz


    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

      Alot of times the height requirements have less to do with the ride but more to do with the restraints and ride vehicles.

      As for Indy being higher than Space, I can totally see that. You don't sit low on Indy as you do on Space. There really are no sides on the vehicle. It only has a seat belt and you are tossed around a bit.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

        Originally posted by sir clinksalot
        Alot of times the height requirements have less to do with the ride but more to do with the restraints and ride vehicles.

        As for Indy being higher than Space, I can totally see that. You don't sit low on Indy as you do on Space. There really are no sides on the vehicle. It only has a seat belt and you are tossed around a bit.

        I can see the point.
        Still think Indy does less tossing
        and if you can put two adults between the child (and in the middle) I don't see why they can't ride.
        And what does height (in Indy) have to do w/ falling out?
        If you fall, you fall. Being tall isn't going to stop you.
        I realize that they feel sometimes height goes along w/ age
        but my friends sister is shorter than normal.
        She's in her early 30's...they won't let her ride any of the rides that have a requirement. Now I think that is just silly for some of them...I can see the ones that have shoulder restraints and if your shoulders can't reach that point..then I can understand not letting them on.
        Quote by Al:
        To that end I'd like the Internet community to join me in reminding the Disney company that "it all started with Walt." As you can see below we've created some T-shirts, plus a few simple graphics that you can copy and paste into your websites to let folks know how you feel.
        -Al Lutz


        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

          Originally posted by DLFreak71
          I wonder about some of them.
          Most kids can get on Space Mountain
          but you have to be taller to get onto Indy.
          I would think Indy would be easier to get on than Space.
          I think Space throws around a child more than Indy does.
          I think Screamin' has the tallest heigh requirement that all the rides.
          The tallest is actually Maliboomer (52"). Screamin and Orange Stinger are right after it though (48"). If you want to count Autopia for when you can drive alone it is at 52" though. I do understand why they have the heights as they do.
          But as for the original post, I can't believe a CM would do that and risk something happening. I don't care if a child is just a tad bit shy of that height requirement, the CM has the responsibilty to tell the parent the child isn't tall enough. I know there are lots of CMs that do follow those rules, as they should. My oldest was just like an inch off of Mulholland years ago and the CM was very nice about it. We weren't sure if he was at 42 at that point or not. And he was a bit upset but got over it fast (we rode Jumpin Jellyfish a bunch of times in a row that day since it was slow). But sadly with how people get so sue happy about things, not only would that CM have been responsible for letting the child get through to something they shouldn't but Disney would as well and the parent(s) would of course blame them all and not take any responsibilty for their part in it. I am just amazed (I know I shouldn't be) at how many parents will do such things instead of just telling their child "sorry but you aren't tall enough yet and we will have to do that when you are." Then give them a choice of something else they can do to get their mind off it.
          Princess Anna

          Mom To
          Video Game Player-Noah (6/5/98)
          &
          Baseball Player, 2 times All Stars Basketball Player & All Net Champ -Kaleb (3/8/02)
          &
          Ballerina Princess Skylar (9/21/06)
          A crowded day at Disneyland beats a busy day of housework!!

          etsy.com/shop/FantasyFunTutus

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

            IMO space is alot smoother than INDY...indy is a very rough ride.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

              I've seen people going to very EXTREME measures to get kids on rides.

              Spiked hair, Ice Cream in the shoes ... yeah.

              I'll admit that our Son used to have a pair of "Coaster Shoes". They were basically shoes that had a higher than normal sole and we put some foot pads in there. This gave him about a 1/2 an inch when he was 47 1/2 inches tall.

              Sure it was not the right thing to do but we were still very selective on the rides he could actually ride at 48". NONE of the rides he rode then were any more intense than the same rides he rode in Texas that has a 42" height requirement.

              But now he's 49" and it's not an issue.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

                Smoke Jumpers may have a height requirement, but I would think it's only because smaller kids can't jump up onto the rope swing. My son fell off everytime - because he thought it was fun. It was funny watching older kids get rejected because they were too tall! How's that for role reversal.
                sigpic
                Will trade husband for Disneyland and DCA Pins!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

                  We went yesterday for the 4th, and my 4 yo son just hit the 40" marks on BTRR and soaring, but was a god 3/4 in short on Star Tours. The CM just shook her head and said that this was the correct height.
                  spunky likes to suck that 3rd nipple(why am I your sig line........freak)! - Posted by my good friend Samsma

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

                    I don't see why clunky shoes are a wrong thing to do- until Disney puts in place a requirement to measure them barefoot- if they are tall enough in shoes- they are tall enough in shoes.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

                      Originally posted by Nephythys
                      I don't see why clunky shoes are a wrong thing to do- until Disney puts in place a requirement to measure them barefoot- if they are tall enough in shoes- they are tall enough in shoes.
                      Yep, we have this same problem at tower. We see a child who, you know isnt tall enough without the shoes. As long as they make the 40inc requirement they could ride. However, when I notice this I tell the parents that they do meet it but its what the shoes are making them tall and they are taking the risk of their own child's life.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

                        I posted this link in another thread regarding height requirements, but the big shoe discussion here also pertains to this link:

                        http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...y&RS=AN/Disney

                        That's a Disney patent application for different height measuring devices. Among these, are several variations of height checks that require the child to be sitting to be measured, which would totally negate any shoe lifts and be more realistic to the actual ride conditions.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

                          Height requirements are there for safety reasons, as I'm sure you all understand. I've met plenty of people who don't get it though, including that set of parents that say, "Oh, but I'll hold him real tight and be responsible for anything that happens."

                          Yeah, right.

                          My favorite though, is a little event my sister told me about one day when she was working a roller coaster. They had to shut the whole thing down because the parent wouldn't leave with their kid and get this - He said that it was okay since his kid was able to put on their own socks.

                          ....I don't know what putting on socks has to do with meeting height requirements for safety either. People are strange.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

                            Some parks do use the 48" (without shoes). Cedar Point is one of them as this was a big problem there.

                            Not sure if the other Cedar Fair parks have followed suit. I haven't noticed this at Knott's.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Something interesting with Height Requirements

                              Didn't Disneyland use to have a bunch of 48" height requirements. I seem to remember that Indy and Rocket Rods used to have it. Does anyone know why the lowered Indy's height requirement from it? I've never noticed any adjustments to the jeeps or the restraint systems.

                              I always worry about the staffing at the Cedar Fair parks and at Six Flags. I can't recall anyone every checking height requirements at their coasters. On my last trip to Knott's I was deathly afraid of all these almost too short children hopping onto Silver Bullet. They make the height restrictions for a reason!

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X