First apologies if someone already posted this, but I didn't see it anywhere.
Most of us know the luster is fading from Disney ever since the Eisner/Pressler days, and with the advent of Chapek, it has accelerated. For the most part, those observations have been a little inside baseball from the fans.
Now those critiques of Chapek are appearing in more substantial publications. For example, this was in the Financial Times, Disney’s chief on his war with Netflix, irking the talent and breaking with the past
Some juicy tidbits:
"Chapek’s experience running theme parks sets him apart from both his predecessors Bob Iger and Michael Eisner, who started at the bottom of American television and hustled their way to the top. They saw themselves as creative people at heart. But Chapek came into the CEO role as a relative unknown in Hollywood and on Wall Street, despite a nearly 30-year career at Disney that included successful stints running distribution for the Walt Disney Studios and as president of the home entertainment division. By his own description, he has spent his career with his “head down” as he focused on the job at hand. “Chapek is not a visible person,” says Rich Greenfield, an analyst at LightShed Partners."
It get's better...
"Perhaps that’s why the talent agents, attorneys, financial analysts and journalists who populate the American entertainment ecosystem tend to view him as a 'parks guy' — an outsider, a number-cruncher, a cost-cutter. A former entertainment executive at Disney adds that Chapek’s reputation inside the company is 'very operational'.
The notion that he is merely a bean-counter irks Chapek. 'I’ve seen creativity in this company through every lens possible,' he says in an exclusive interview. He compares running the theme parks with observing “a focus group every day” that gave him a unique perspective on “what makes the Walt Disney Company so different from any other media company'. He adds, 'It ties us to our ultimate constituent, which is the consumer.'"
Love it!
Most of us know the luster is fading from Disney ever since the Eisner/Pressler days, and with the advent of Chapek, it has accelerated. For the most part, those observations have been a little inside baseball from the fans.
Now those critiques of Chapek are appearing in more substantial publications. For example, this was in the Financial Times, Disney’s chief on his war with Netflix, irking the talent and breaking with the past
Some juicy tidbits:
"Chapek’s experience running theme parks sets him apart from both his predecessors Bob Iger and Michael Eisner, who started at the bottom of American television and hustled their way to the top. They saw themselves as creative people at heart. But Chapek came into the CEO role as a relative unknown in Hollywood and on Wall Street, despite a nearly 30-year career at Disney that included successful stints running distribution for the Walt Disney Studios and as president of the home entertainment division. By his own description, he has spent his career with his “head down” as he focused on the job at hand. “Chapek is not a visible person,” says Rich Greenfield, an analyst at LightShed Partners."
It get's better...
"Perhaps that’s why the talent agents, attorneys, financial analysts and journalists who populate the American entertainment ecosystem tend to view him as a 'parks guy' — an outsider, a number-cruncher, a cost-cutter. A former entertainment executive at Disney adds that Chapek’s reputation inside the company is 'very operational'.
The notion that he is merely a bean-counter irks Chapek. 'I’ve seen creativity in this company through every lens possible,' he says in an exclusive interview. He compares running the theme parks with observing “a focus group every day” that gave him a unique perspective on “what makes the Walt Disney Company so different from any other media company'. He adds, 'It ties us to our ultimate constituent, which is the consumer.'"
Love it!
Comment