Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Registrations

New user registrations are verified at least once per day. Thank you for your patience.
2 of 2 < >

Your Assistance Please

We need your help to battle spammers and also to keep our community user friendly.
PLEASE BE KIND TO OTHERS - Refrain from personal attacks. Avoid politics and harsh language whenever possible. If someone is violating our simple rules, DO NOT confront them, simply report the post.
STOP SPAMMERS - Report the post. DO NOT respond to them.

2017 is a year of renewal for us, we have lots of exciting changes on the way for you, but we don't have time to deal with trolls and spammers. If you find yourself suspended and need to plead your case, you will need to do so after your suspension. We are happy to address your concerns if you made a simple mistake. However, please note that those with a history of bad behavior and pushing our rules to the limit will not be given the courtesy of a reply.

MiceChat offers a number of ways for you to communicate and get involved. We offer Facebook Groups and Pages, Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest accounts. We have a front page filled with amazing content. We offer weekly meetups in the parks. Meets and events all over the world. Podcasts and videos. And we continue to maintain forums for your posting convenience. But with all those options, we can't be everywhere all the time. We need YOUR help. Please don't poke the trolls. Report posts and leave reputation. We'll do our best to keep the forums clean and active, but we can't do so without your help.

Thank you for your support folks, it's going to be a really fantastic year in the MiceChat world.
See more
See less

Is Disneyworld's Twilight Zone Tower of Terror in peril?

Collapse

Ad Widget

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Professortango View Post

    DHS is moving away from being a park themed around a movie studio and more about a park themed around movie properties. Star Wars Land, Toy Story Land, Muppet Courtyard, Super Hero Land, and a Hollywood entrance/hub sounds inline with their thinking.

    Plus, I think kind of missed opportunities like the 5th Dimension Room could really be improved with the new story line. DHS' Tower is much better suited for the change due to the space in the actual attraction and it gets them into the same Merchandising spot they want with Guardians toys and t's replacing Twilight Zone merch.
    Don't give them ideas!! Tower of Terror is the second most important haunted attraction at Disney. The one in Florida should be kept off Marvel.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Professortango View Post

      DHS is moving away from being a park themed around a movie studio and more about a park themed around movie properties. Star Wars Land, Toy Story Land, Muppet Courtyard, Super Hero Land, and a Hollywood entrance/hub sounds inline with their thinking.

      Plus, I think kind of missed opportunities like the 5th Dimension Room could really be improved with the new story line. DHS' Tower is much better suited for the change due to the space in the actual attraction and it gets them into the same Merchandising spot they want with Guardians toys and t's replacing Twilight Zone merch.

      Originally posted by mtlchuck View Post

      Don't give them ideas!! Tower of Terror is the second most important haunted attraction at Disney. The one in Florida should be kept off Marvel.
      I was gonna say!!!! XD
      KA CHOW

      Comment


      • #18
        The reality is, if DCA's was expendable, they all eventually will be.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by k_peek_2000 View Post
          The reality is, if DCA's was expendable, they all eventually will be.
          I'm hoping the backlash was enough to dissuade that dummy Chapek.
          KA CHOW

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by k_peek_2000 View Post
            The reality is, if DCA's was expendable, they all eventually will be.
            True, sad to say.


            Originally posted by 1LE McQueen View Post
            I'm hoping the backlash was enough to dissuade that dummy Chapek.
            Unfortunately, not a chance. The only thing that will stop the 2Bobs from turning WDW and DLR into berm-to-berm brand infomercials is a significant drop in visitor numbers, accompanied by internal polls that peg poor value and excessive brand promotion as the causes.

            Even then, management's first response would be to blame other factors and launch a tsunami of discount pricing schemes.

            Sad to say, as long as consumer products marketers are running the Magic Kingdoms, WDW and DLR will increasingly be transformed into WalMarts of brands, brands and more brands -- originality, innovation and theme appropriateness be damned.


            Last edited by Mr Wiggins; 02-12-2017, 04:59 PM.
            "With the acquisition of Marvel and now of Lucasfilm,
            Disney may have finally found the grail. You don't need
            imagination or art. All you need is a brand."

            - Neil Gabler

            Comment


            • #21
              Personally, I think within the next 10 years, there's a chance the Twilight Zone theme will go away at WDW. I mean don't they have to pay for the licensing for a show that's in syndication and hasn't had a new episode since the early 2000's? Maybe the agreement is different for each side of the Mississippi, just like how Marvel is split at the parks.

              I'd prefer both ToT's be converted into what they have at Tokyo Disney Sea where it's not a TV show or movie franchise, but just a well fleshed storyline.

              Ultimately, Disney is more into selling product inside AND outside of the parks in multiple forms of media and merchandise. Toys, movies, shirts, tv shows, etc. They can't do that with a Big Thunder or Jungle Cruise until they make a movie or TV show. I'm not saying I agree, but it's pretty much in our faces.
              Last edited by Wreckless Abrandon; 04-03-2017, 01:02 PM. Reason: mistyped something

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Wreckless Abrandon View Post
                ...and hasn't had a new episode since the early 2000's?
                There hasn't been a new episode since 1964.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by HM999 View Post
                  There hasn't been a new episode since 1964.
                  You're talking about the original show. They had a revival twice... once in the mid to late 80's, and then early in the 2000's. I think they remade some of the original episodes, but there are mostly new stories. For example, they remade the one on the plane with William Shatner from the 60's version, using John Lithgow in the 80's version. But I think the majority of them are new stories. I know there's talk of a new series, but that's been thrown around for a few years with nothing to show for it.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by k_peek_2000 View Post
                    The reality is, if DCA's was expendable, they all eventually will be.
                    I hate ,to say your right ,But your right , DCA's was expendable ,
                    for it did not start out right,in the first place-- originality, innovation was not there.
                    and why it's being use for Disney Marketing IP Billboard!
                    imo
                    Soaring like an EAGLE !

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      to its credit, that attraction is the Disney Studios theme park poster child. And considering it is the absolute original out of every one (knock off or different story), the execs would have to be pretty heartless to approve the change. I wouldn't be surprised if Chapek ran the idea past them already and they put the vote to a NO.

                      And who cares if there hasn't been a Twilight Zone show in so long? More then half of everything at Disneyland is older then Twilight Zone.
                      KA CHOW

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by 1LE McQueen View Post
                        to its credit, that attraction is the Disney Studios theme park poster child. And considering it is the absolute original out of every one (knock off or different story), the execs would have to be pretty heartless to approve the change. I wouldn't be surprised if Chapek ran the idea past them already and they put the vote to a NO.

                        And who cares if there hasn't been a Twilight Zone show in so long? More then half of everything at Disneyland is older then Twilight Zone.
                        The reason it did not happen in Florida (Yet?) is because so much of DHS is a construction zone right now that if they shut down Tower there would be virtually nothing to do in the park and Georgre Kalogridis more or less put his foot down and said no.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by 1LE McQueen View Post

                          And who cares if there hasn't been a Twilight Zone show in so long? More then half of everything at Disneyland is older then Twilight Zone.
                          The shareholders care. The Executives care. They ultimately care about how much money Disney has to spend to make money. I'm talking about how they pay licensing to use the Twilight Zone name. Snow White is older, and so is Cinderella, but Disney keeps them relevant and owns the likenesses of them. That's a huge difference. As much as I like and watch the Twilight Zone shows, most people don't recognize or care about it as much as they do with the Disney Princesses. If you show someone a character from the Twilight Zone next to Aurora or Snow White or Cinderella, the vast majority of people will know who they are and not the Twilight Zone character. Why spend money on a license that most people don't recognize?

                          If they don't have to pay for something additional every year for the licensing, they'd rather not bother with it. I'd rather not have any movie or TV tie in to be honest.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by HMF View Post

                            The reason it did not happen in Florida (Yet?) is because so much of DHS is a construction zone right now that if they shut down Tower there would be virtually nothing to do in the park and Georgre Kalogridis more or less put his foot down and said no.
                            Originally posted by Wreckless Abrandon View Post

                            The shareholders care. The Executives care. They ultimately care about how much money Disney has to spend to make money. I'm talking about how they pay licensing to use the Twilight Zone name. Snow White is older, and so is Cinderella, but Disney keeps them relevant and owns the likenesses of them. That's a huge difference. As much as I like and watch the Twilight Zone shows, most people don't recognize or care about it as much as they do with the Disney Princesses. If you show someone a character from the Twilight Zone next to Aurora or Snow White or Cinderella, the vast majority of people will know who they are and not the Twilight Zone character. Why spend money on a license that most people don't recognize?

                            If they don't have to pay for something additional every year for the licensing, they'd rather not bother with it. I'd rather not have any movie or TV tie in to be honest.
                            I'm being very wishful on this subject. I don't want that ride to go anywhere.

                            We can argue this left and right, but I think we as enthusiasts deserve to know if the Florida version will be in danger or not, because right now it is all speculation.
                            KA CHOW

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by 1LE McQueen View Post



                              I'm being very wishful on this subject. I don't want that ride to go anywhere.

                              We can argue this left and right, but I think we as enthusiasts deserve to know if the Florida version will be in danger or not, because right now it is all speculation.
                              According to Chapek it's not, but neither was DCA's.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by HMF View Post

                                According to Chapek it's not, but neither was DCA's.
                                Did he say that about DCA's? I remember hearing somewhere he said something along the lines of "we have no plans as of now" in regards to the HS version
                                KA CHOW

                                Comment

                                Ad Widget

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X