Your Assistance Please

We need your help to battle spammers and also to keep our community user friendly.
PLEASE BE KIND TO OTHERS - Refrain from personal attacks. Avoid politics and harsh language whenever possible. If someone is violating our simple rules, DO NOT confront them, simply report the post.
STOP SPAMMERS - Report the post. DO NOT respond to them.

2017 is a year of renewal for us, we have lots of exciting changes on the way for you, but we don't have time to deal with trolls and spammers. If you find yourself suspended and need to plead your case, you will need to do so after your suspension. We are happy to address your concerns if you made a simple mistake. However, please note that those with a history of bad behavior and pushing our rules to the limit will not be given the courtesy of a reply.

MiceChat offers a number of ways for you to communicate and get involved. We offer Facebook Groups and Pages, Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest accounts. We have a front page filled with amazing content. We offer weekly meetups in the parks. Meets and events all over the world. Podcasts and videos. And we continue to maintain forums for your posting convenience. But with all those options, we can't be everywhere all the time. We need YOUR help. Please don't poke the trolls. Report posts and leave reputation. We'll do our best to keep the forums clean and active, but we can't do so without your help.

Thank you for your support folks, it's going to be a really fantastic year in the MiceChat world.
See more
See less

Will Wikileaks Revolutionize Journalism?


Ad Widget

This topic is closed.
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Will Wikileaks Revolutionize Journalism?

    Sean Gonsalves writes about the controversial information website at Alternet.
    Will Wikileaks Revolutionize Journalism?
    By Sean Gonsalves, AlterNet

    Posted on July 7, 2008

    As popular a reference tool as Wikipedia has become, our newsroom policy doesn't allow for our reporters to use it as an official source for any story. And for good reason: anyone with access to a computer can edit entries.Through the various industry grapevines, I've ascertained that the Cape Cod Times isn't the only news organization that considers Wikipedia to be a potentially polluted source.

    Wikileaks, however, is a different animal -- despite the similar interface the fledgling whistleblower site shares with Wikipedia.

    If you're not familiar with Wikileaks, you should be because, since it debuted last year, the international transparency network behind the site has forced governments and news media to take notice, most recently with the posting of whistleblower documents that indicate "thousands of sterilizations, and possibly some abortions, took place in 23 Texas Catholic hospitals from 2000 to 2003," as reported by the Catholic News Service in the wake of the leak.

    The same day of the Catholic hospitals leak (June 15), Wikileaks posted the 219-page U.S. military counterinsurgency manual, Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces (1994, 2004).

    Wikileaks investigative editor Julian Assange writes that the manual can be "critically described as 'what we learned about running death squads and propping up corrupt government in Latin America and how to apply it to other places.' It's contents are both history defining for Latin America and, given the continued role of U.S. Special Forces in the suppression of insurgencies, including in Iraq and Afghanistan, history making."

    Students of U.S. foreign policy history, particularly guerrilla warfare history, will find no real surprises in the counterinsurgency manual, as eye-popping as it may be to some.

    In February, Wikileaks posted the secret rules of engagement for U.S. troops in Iraq, which was followed by The New York Times and prompted the Iranian government to hold a press conference, warning U.S. military planners about border crossings. The Washington Post reported on leaked Guantanamo detainee policy documents first posted on Wikileaks that forced the Pentagon to respond.

    Wikileaks describes itself as a site that's "developing an uncensorable Wikipedia for untraceable mass document leaking and analysis. Our primary interest is in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we also expect to be of assistance to people of all regions who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and corporations. We aim for maximum political impact."

    (continued at link)
    Has anyone here heard of Wikileaks or read it before? I hadn't ever heard of Wikileaks before I read this article, but from what I've seen so far of it, it's a real treasure trove of information, including information that desperately deserves to be publicized and too often isn't.
    Last edited by Retrocool; 07-12-2008, 06:50 PM. Reason: Easier summation

  • #2
    Re: Will Wikileaks Revolutionize Journalism?

    Nobody's heard about Wikileaks? Or everyone's heard about Wikileaks?


    • #3
      Re: Will Wikileaks Revolutionize Journalism?

      The problem is simply that journalism is dead. Dead as Jacob Marley. Oh, sure there are still people who call themselves journalists and Journalism is still being taught in schools, but in practice - no such thing exists anymore. There is only corporate media and infotainment passing as "news". We will never see the likes of Edward R. Murrow again.

      Seriously, what people believe to be "journalism" is no longer the collecting, aggregating, and reporting of events that is called "News", it is simply a regurgitation of the factoids the media outlets owners and sponsors want you to hear repeatedly. Sure the local front will cover some local events to give an air of credibility and legitimacy, but beyond that - well... read George Orwell's 1984 and you get the point. We have always been at war with Eurasia.

      The sad thing is - Wikileaks is about as close to ACTUAL journalism as we have nowadays.

      I'm not feeding that wolf anymore. And so it goes.


      I am Sambo, and I endorse this signature.


      Ad Widget