The prosecutor, who was from Orange County and was sent to do the trial in Texas, said that they make charts of the expensive homes and other expenses that Lay had used his money for, and then saw the jurors eyes glazing over with that information, so they quickly cut to the "Ken Lay was a bad man" evidence. The thing is, any CEO of a major company is going to be wealthy. That, by itself, is not evidence of motivation for, or of, criminal activity.
A little of topic but I have noticed as of late also that if there is some sort of turmoil in companies the first person to get pointed at is the CEO, even if the CEO had nothing to do with the problem. Some people in companies do fraudulent activities behind the CEO's back. It could happen.
Leave a comment: