Announcement

Collapse
1 of 3 < >

MiceChat Knott's Scary Farm Event

Tickets for MiceChat's annual Knott's Scary Farm meetup are now on sale. Event info can be found here - scaryfarm2017.eventzilla.net
2 of 3 < >

Tom Chaney Memorial Debate Lounge

The Tom Chaney Memorial Debate Lounge has been opened. You can find it in the Lounges section.

All MiceChat rules still apply.
3 of 3 < >

Registrations

All new user registrations require email verification. Please make sure that micechat.com is not blocked by your SPAM filter. Approvals are done at least once per day, but no approval will be given for accounts that have not verified their email address. No account created using anonymous services will be approved. These include proxies, VPN's, and Tor exit nodes. IP address reputations are also checked. Any IP address with questionable reputation will be banned and the registration denied.
See more
See less

The illuminated "K" in logo script atop the Sky Tower, Who & When made it a Landmark?

Collapse

Ad Widget

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The illuminated "K" in logo script atop the Sky Tower, Who & When made it a Landmark?

    Just wondering, The illuminated "K" is a Landmark for Knott's But could it be placed on Supreme Scream or a new Ride. I like seeing it from the freeway and would miss it if they had to take it down. I just couldn't find any official record designating it as a official landmark.
    Visit me at: Gabriel Felton

  • #2
    I've often thought about this, but have not been able to come up with any actual answer as to who designated it a landmark. Just about everything I've found online has been copied from the Wikipeda page. It's worded in a way that makes it sound like someone other than Knott's made it a landmark, because it "prevented" them from using the area for Windseeker. However I don't even know how true that is.

    Hopefully someone comes along and is able to shed some light.



    Comment


    • #3
      Are we even sure it has been designated a landmark? I can't find any reference to it on the National Register of Historic Places or the California Office of Historic Preservation.
      "In Hell, everybody loves popcorn."

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by deadwinterskies View Post
        Are we even sure it has been designated a landmark? I can't find any reference to it on the National Register of Historic Places or the California Office of Historic Preservation.
        That is my question as well. I took a look at the National Register, and nothing came up. It could have been misinformation that spread from Wikipedia.


        Comment


        • #5
          If I remember correctly when wind seeker was still in the planning stages it was decided it would go where sky cabin was which would have the old tower removed and a taller tower replace it. People didn't like the idea of removing the K tower and had a petition to make the K tower a historical landmark. That may be when it Happened

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by explodingboy View Post
            That is my question as well. I took a look at the National Register, and nothing came up. It could have been misinformation that spread from Wikipedia.
            It's probably more poor wording than misinformation and the author meant it was a landmark within the context of the park and not that it was an officially designated one.
            "In Hell, everybody loves popcorn."

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Pixtopher View Post
              People didn't like the idea of removing the K tower and had a petition to make the K tower a historical landmark. That may be when it Happened
              But if it was designated a historical landmark there would be a record of that. It could be that a petition got started but before they gathered the necessary number of signatures Knotts acquiesced to public pressure and the petition was abandoned.
              "In Hell, everybody loves popcorn."

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by deadwinterskies View Post

                It's probably more poor wording than misinformation and the author meant it was a landmark within the context of the park and not that it was an officially designated one.
                Yeah, you're probably right!


                Comment


                • #9
                  This article from the time of the Windseeker construction states that they simply changed their mind since the Sky Tower is an older ride with a following.

                  http://www.themeparktourist.com/news...cabin-reprieve

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    i was told its a ffa land mark for the planes the whole tower is a land mark

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Chiming in with the sad news — the tower and its non-functioning neon K are not officially landmarked or protected in any way. That giant K is iconic and a huge roadside attraction, but there are no city, state or federal regulations protecting the tower or its neon K from demolition. ...But there should be!

                      Comment

                      Ad Widget

                      Collapse
                      Working...
                      X