Announcement

**Adventurer** · 05-16-2005, 07:41 PM

Originally posted by mamabot

Part of the reason we are careful about the images we allow on MiceChat is that we have MiceChatters who are under the legal age of 18.

MiceChat is a message board that focuses on a family theme park. I would hope that people would understand why we need to keep topics and images that could get us shut down off of our web site.

Hmmm so the family characters from the family theme park engaging in a sex orgy with group sex, gang , and dwarves butt****ing each other, is somehow okay and has been allowed to stay, but the DLP Flashers are somehow "pornography" and must be censored? Yeah, explain that logic to me...espeically since both are posted with a link and a warning.

You need to be equal in your "moderation".

**dramaqueen** · 05-16-2005, 07:47 PM

How about before you criticize the mods you get all the facts first.

**Adventurer** · 05-16-2005, 07:48 PM

Originally posted by dramaqueen

How about before you criticize the mods you get all the facts first.

I think the facts are pretty clear.

**dramaqueen** · 05-16-2005, 07:49 PM

did you know that the picture was originally posted in the DLP forum??? And that it was not linked to, but showed up as soon as you opened the thread? And that no warning was posted?

**Adventurer** · 05-16-2005, 07:51 PM

Originally posted by dramaqueen

did you know that the picture was originally posted in the DLP forum??? And that it was not linked to, but showed up as soon as you opened the thread? And that no warning was posted?

Why yes, as a matter of fact I DID know that. Did you bother to read the original thread in the DLP forum? Because if you had, you'd see that I was an active participant in this thread and I am the one who suggested that it be MOVED here and posted as a LINK with a WARNING...just like your Family Theme Park Characters Sex Orgy post. I fail to see how one is any worse than the other. Mamabot talks about members under 18. So, DLP flashsers picture is harmful to members under 18 but the animated orgy picture is A-OKAY for them to view. What kind of double standard is that?

**dramaqueen** · 05-16-2005, 07:56 PM

I posted it here in the first place and didn't try to put it up again after several moderators took it down and closed the thread.

If I had tried posting that pic in the Disneyland forum, you can bet it would have been closed in a heartbeat, only I wouldn't have tried to repost it here afterwards. The picture also had an article posted with it and was published as mainstream news, not as softcore voyeristic porn

**Adventurer** · 05-16-2005, 07:59 PM

Originally posted by dramaqueen

I posted it here in the first place and didn't try to put it up again after several moderators took it down and closed the thread.

If I had tried posting that pic in the Disneyland forum, you can bet it would have been closed in a heartbeat, only I wouldn't have tried to repost it here afterwards. The picture also had an article posted with it and was published as mainstream news, not as softcore voyeristic porn

OH for Gods sake, let's rationalize shall we

? The point at issue here is the content, and the content of your link is no better or worse than the content of the DLP Pirates flashers link. Also, "several" moderaters did not take it down in the DLP forum, it was one LAZY moderator by the name of Ian Parkinson, and the thread wasn't closed until Evil Minion came along and closed it EVEN AFTER the picture had been removed from the original thread.

**dramaqueen** · 05-16-2005, 08:01 PM

If you are easily offended or at a place of work, we recommend you stay out of this forum.

You know what they say: "where there's a litter box, there's bound to be . . . "

The warning posted in this forum-

I am glad you are not a moderator since you can't see the difference between the two threads you are complaining about. The mods are not obligated to rationalize their actions to any of us. If you have a problem with the job they are doing- why don't you address it in a PM instead of bashing them in public?

**Adventurer** · 05-16-2005, 08:04 PM

Originally posted by dramaqueen

The warning posted in this forum-

If you are easily offended or at a place of work, we recommend you stay out of this forum.

You know what they say: "where there's a litter box, there's bound to be . . . "

YES EXACTLY. So now can someone still rationalize logically why the DLP Flashers were removed, but YOUR post wasn't? Apparently there is some concern with "underage" micechatters and the content they may see. Can someone logically explain why your post is of no concern but the DLP Pirates Flashers are?

**Adventurer** · 05-16-2005, 08:05 PM

Originally posted by dramaqueen

I am glad you are not a moderator since you can't see the difference between the two threads you are complaining about.

Pray tell, what is the difference in content?

**Morrigoon** · 05-16-2005, 08:07 PM

Frankly, this is not a democracy.

This site is run by real people as a hobby, and they owe you absolutely nothing. They certainly do not have any requirement to allow you to put their reputations on the line by posting photographs of body parts and sexual acts. There are young people who post on these boards and those young people have parents who may wish to maintain some control over what their kids see on the internet, whether their kids are 13, or two days shy of 18.

They have every right to maintain their site as they see fit.

**dramaqueen** · 05-16-2005, 08:07 PM

:roll eyes:

because I clearly warned that the material was offensive before hand and posted a direct link instead of the actual picture.

I did not post it anywhere else. I also did not try to repost it after it had already been removed.

I would not have been surprised if it had been removed however. But I did not try to get around the system, I used it and that is why is was not removed.

If that is not rational or logical enough for you than I can;t help you.

**Adventurer** · 05-16-2005, 08:10 PM

Originally posted by Morrigoon

Frankly, this is not a democracy.
They certainly do not have any requirement to allow you to put their reputations on the line by posting photographs of body parts and sexual acts. There are young people who post on these boards and those young people have parents who may wish to maintain some control over what their kids see on the internet, whether their kids are 13, or two days shy of 18.

They have every right to maintain their site as they see fit.

WHAT BODY PARTS????? Did you even see the photo? NO BODY PARTS WERE EXPOSED. NONE.

Then you bring up "sexual acts" of which dramaqueen's posting shows a hell of a lot more of, animated or not. Still no logic here.

**dramaqueen** · 05-16-2005, 08:11 PM

you have an interesting definition of logic.

**Adventurer** · 05-16-2005, 08:14 PM

Originally posted by dramaqueen

:roll eyes:

because I clearly warned that the material was offensive before hand and posted a direct link instead of the actual picture.

And so did he.

Originally posted by dramaqueen

I did not post it anywhere else. I also did not try to repost it after it had already been removed.

B-F-D.

Originally posted by dramaqueen

I would not have been surprised if it had been removed however. But I did not try to get around the system, I used it and that is why is was not removed.

Get around the system? A) He didn't know the Litter Box existed. Go back and READ the original thread in the DLP forum. B) I explained to him what the litterbox was and instructed him on HOW to post here using YOUR Family Characters from a Family Theme Park Orgy photo thread as a model.

Originally posted by dramaqueen

If that is not rational or logical enough for you than I can;t help you.

Errrm..umm..yah it's logical when you live in Fantasyland.

**Adventurer** · 05-16-2005, 08:17 PM

Originally posted by dramaqueen

you have an interesting definition of logic.

You have no logic. However I suppose I would expect you to defend YOUR post as A-OKAY when presented with evidence that if the other goes, so should yours.

**Not Afraid** · 05-16-2005, 08:18 PM

OK. This is getting to be a bit much for even the litter box. Policy is made by the Admins and Mods of MiceChat. I think you will find that this is consistant with other discussion boards. In either case, that is the fact. If there is a change or ammendment to a policy, we will let you know. Meanwhile, why don't we drop this discussion for now.

**dramaqueen** · 05-16-2005, 08:20 PM

Hey don't get pissed just because I don't agree with you- if the mods removed mine, I wouldn't care- its their perogative to do what they want to do. I am only definding their actions because I think they are being reasonable and you are being asanine- but I am done because you obviously think you are right and god forbid someone should tell you otherwise.

The mods can do whatever they want to- if that bothers you, start your own website and you can moderate it however you see fit.

**Adventurer** · 05-16-2005, 08:21 PM

Originally posted by dramaqueen

Hey don't get pissed just because I don't agree with you- if the mods removed mine, I wouldn't care- its their perogative to do what they want to do. I am only definding their actions because I think they are being reasonable and you are being asanine- but I am done because you obviously think you are right and god forbid someone should tell you otherwise.

The mods can do whatever they want to- if that bothers you, start your own website and you can moderate it however you see fit.

Well I think they are being quite UNREASONABLE. Asinine? No, I want even handedness.

Announcement

Total Bull****

Get Away Today

Total Bull****

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Get Away Today Footer