1 of 2 < >


New user registrations are verified at least once per day. Thank you for your patience.
2 of 2 < >

Your Assistance Please

We need your help to battle spammers and also to keep our community user friendly.
PLEASE BE KIND TO OTHERS - Refrain from personal attacks. Avoid politics and harsh language whenever possible. If someone is violating our simple rules, DO NOT confront them, simply report the post.
STOP SPAMMERS - Report the post. DO NOT respond to them.

2017 is a year of renewal for us, we have lots of exciting changes on the way for you, but we don't have time to deal with trolls and spammers. If you find yourself suspended and need to plead your case, you will need to do so after your suspension. We are happy to address your concerns if you made a simple mistake. However, please note that those with a history of bad behavior and pushing our rules to the limit will not be given the courtesy of a reply.

MiceChat offers a number of ways for you to communicate and get involved. We offer Facebook Groups and Pages, Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest accounts. We have a front page filled with amazing content. We offer weekly meetups in the parks. Meets and events all over the world. Podcasts and videos. And we continue to maintain forums for your posting convenience. But with all those options, we can't be everywhere all the time. We need YOUR help. Please don't poke the trolls. Report posts and leave reputation. We'll do our best to keep the forums clean and active, but we can't do so without your help.

Thank you for your support folks, it's going to be a really fantastic year in the MiceChat world.
See more
See less

U.S. Supreme Court says 'No Pooh For You!!!'


Ad Widget

This topic is closed.
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • U.S. Supreme Court says 'No Pooh For You!!!'

    Story at:

    Top Court Won't Hear Winnie the Pooh Case
    Monday June 26, 1:18 pm ET Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Copyright Appeal by Granddaughter of Winnie the Pooh Creator

    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court refused Monday to decide whether the granddaughter of A.A. Milne, the creator of Winnie the Pooh, can recapture control of the copyright for stories featuring the popular children's character.

    Milne wrote the Pooh books between 1924 and 1928 and granted a license to Stephen Slesinger in 1930. Slesinger, in turn, granted his rights to Stephen Slesinger Inc. The company sublicensed certain rights to the Pooh works to the Walt Disney Co.

    When Milne died in 1956, he did not bequeath ownership of the copyright to his family but to a trust that later became known as the Pooh Properties Trust.

    Clare Milne, who was not born when her grandfather died, sought to use a 1976 copyright law to terminate the prior licensing agreement and recapture ownership of the copyright.

    Lawyers for Slesinger urged justices to reject the appeal, accusing Disney of bankrolling Milne's lawsuit because of a 13-year-old dispute over royalties owed to Slesinger. Disney is a co-plaintiff of Milne's.

    The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Milne had no termination right to exercise because the the parties -- the trust, Disney and Slesinger -- all entered into an agreement in 1983 designed to block the family from ever regaining control of the copyright.
    The case is Milne v. Slesinger, 05-1332.
    Growing older is manditory
    Growing up is however, optional

  • #2
    Re: U.S. Supreme Court says 'No Pooh For You!!!'

    Very interesting. Thanks for posting Oogie. It appears that the US Supremes are continuing their strong pro copyright protection bent, and following the lead of countless congressional amendments in that regard...


    Ad Widget