Announcement

Collapse

Your Assistance Please

We need your help to battle spammers and also to keep our community user friendly.
PLEASE BE KIND TO OTHERS - Refrain from personal attacks. Avoid politics and harsh language whenever possible. If someone is violating our simple rules, DO NOT confront them, simply report the post.
STOP SPAMMERS - Report the post. DO NOT respond to them.

2017 is a year of renewal for us, we have lots of exciting changes on the way for you, but we don't have time to deal with trolls and spammers. If you find yourself suspended and need to plead your case, you will need to do so after your suspension. We are happy to address your concerns if you made a simple mistake. However, please note that those with a history of bad behavior and pushing our rules to the limit will not be given the courtesy of a reply.

MiceChat offers a number of ways for you to communicate and get involved. We offer Facebook Groups and Pages, Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest accounts. We have a front page filled with amazing content. We offer weekly meetups in the parks. Meets and events all over the world. Podcasts and videos. And we continue to maintain forums for your posting convenience. But with all those options, we can't be everywhere all the time. We need YOUR help. Please don't poke the trolls. Report posts and leave reputation. We'll do our best to keep the forums clean and active, but we can't do so without your help.

Thank you for your support folks, it's going to be a really fantastic year in the MiceChat world.
See more
See less

Disney Wants Bruckheimer to Be the Happiest Producer on Earth - LA Times 4/23/05

Collapse

Ad Widget

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Disney Wants Bruckheimer to Be the Happiest Producer on Earth - LA Times 4/23/05

    Original article published by The Los Angeles Times April 23, 2005
    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...ck=1&cset=true

    The same story was run by Newsday under the title: "Can Disney produce a deal?"
    The Los Angeles Times - April 28, 2005
    http://www.newsday.com/business/ny-b...ness-headlines

    Originally posted by The Los Angeles Times
    Last week, Walt Disney Co. stole one of Hollywood's biggest producers, Scott Rudin, from Paramount Pictures.

    Now, Disney is working to make sure its own biggest marquee producer, Jerry Bruckheimer, stays in the fold.

    "Much is at stake for Disney in keeping Bruckheimer happy. For more than a decade, the producer has delivered the kind of large-scale, adrenaline-laced films the studio needs to anchor its yearly movie offerings, including 'Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl,' 'Armageddon,' 'The Rock,' 'Crimson Tide' and, most recently, 'National Treasure.'

    Bruckheimer has been courted by game developers and is eager to expand into the business. Disney, meanwhile, is moving back into developing its own games and wants Bruckheimer be a part of it. Disney recently announced that it was buying a small Utah video game developer and investing in a Canadian venture."
    One issue Disney and Bruckheimer must agree on his the profits from DVD sales; however, he is one of the highest paid producers already. Although most of his films have done amazing financially, 'Pearl Harbor' and '"King Arthur' didn't do as well as planned.

    Originally posted by The Los Angeles Times
    ''Jerry's been our power hitter for many years, and it is our desire for him to continue to be our power hitter for years to come,' said Walt Disney Studios chairman Dick Cook.

    Bruckheimer, who is shooting two 'Pirates of the Caribbean' sequels back-to-back, also expressed a desire to extend his run there.

    'I've had a phenomenal relationship over the past 15 years with Dick Cook and his team, and I hope we continue for another 15 years,' said Bruckheimer, 59."
    So both sides appear to want to make this relationship continue. How you feel about it? Are the films worth the high costs of Jerry Bruckheimer? Is the risk too high with some recent mishaps with films or should they be overlooked?

  • #2
    Well, it is a bit wrong, in my opinion, for ANYone to ask to share in the profits and not share in the risk. If he gets profits from DVD sales, grosses, etc, maybe he should have to help cover a similar percentage of losses?

    Comment


    • #3
      I think Bruckheimer has contributed a great deal to the dumbing down of America. His cinematic sewage has made money only by pandering to the ebb and flow of idiotic pop culture through the most basic plots conceivable. His movies, or "Event" movies, make a great deal of money because they are big eye/ear candy that doesn't tax the brain in the least and that is what the majority of moviegoers want.

      The reason why his last couple of movies did not fair so well is because he tried to dip his foot into the "Important" movie pool. That would require vision, forethought, and a message, or something to say. Bruckheimer has nothing to say except 'come to my movies to escape reality', (I paraphrase but he did actually mention, in an interview once, that particular sentiment.)

      Bruckheiner and Disney are, unfortunately, a great match. Neither wants to do anything particulary daring, thoughtful, or risky, and both are out to make money. Because of my particular hatred for the deliberate stupidity in most of his films I have refused to watch anything Bruckheimer produces. I don't want to contribute to that man's bombastic career. Yeah I missed Pirates, and I hear it's actually not bad. That could be because Bruckheimer lucked into good decisions in hiring a very good director like Gore Verbinski. J.B could actually put out a movie with substance, but I an certain it wouldn't be intentional. That would be too original.
      "All my life I've had one dream, to achieve my many goals.
      Homer Jay Simpson


      Comment

      Ad Widget

      Collapse
      Working...
      X