Announcement

Collapse
1 of 3 < >

MiceChat Knott's Scary Farm Event

Tickets for MiceChat's annual Knott's Scary Farm meetup are now on sale. Event info can be found here - scaryfarm2017.eventzilla.net
2 of 3 < >

Tom Chaney Memorial Debate Lounge

The Tom Chaney Memorial Debate Lounge has been opened. You can find it in the Lounges section.

All MiceChat rules still apply.
3 of 3 < >

Registrations

All new user registrations require email verification. Please make sure that micechat.com is not blocked by your SPAM filter. Approvals are done at least once per day, but no approval will be given for accounts that have not verified their email address. No account created using anonymous services will be approved. These include proxies, VPN's, and Tor exit nodes. IP address reputations are also checked. Any IP address with questionable reputation will be banned and the registration denied.
See more
See less

Shareholders speak; no one listens- Ft. Worth Star-Telegram- 5/15/05

Collapse

Ad Widget

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shareholders speak; no one listens- Ft. Worth Star-Telegram- 5/15/05

    Full text of the article available here:
    http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/business/11653441.htm
    (free registration required)

    How's this for corporate democracy in action?

    By a 3-to-1 ratio, Blockbuster shareholders voted last week to throw out Chairman John Antioco and replace him with corporate raider Carl Icahn. Moments later, the directors said they'd create a new board seat and reinstall Antioco as chairman, which they did Friday.

    This turn of events bears repeating because the contradiction boggles the mind: The vast majority of voting shareholders rejected Antioco on Wednesday, but the board, including Icahn and two candidates on his slate, put him back in charge anyway.

    And Icahn calls this a grand victory for corporate governance?

    From my perch, it's an insult: Shareholders spoke, and the board said it knows better.

    One explanation for offering Antioco the job is that it will prevent him from claiming a $54 million golden parachute. The number is outrageous, of course, but so is the event that triggers it.

    It's not as if Antioco lost his job because Blockbuster was acquired. Shareholders voted him out, presumably because he hadn't performed to their standards, and he qualifies for a huge payday?

    If shareholders can't fire Antioco, they ought to fire the directors who approved his contract.

    <snip>

    Last year, Disney's top executive, Michael Eisner, was targeted by high-profile dissidents, and 43 percent of shareholders withheld their support for his re-election to the board. As a result, Eisner was stripped of his chairman's job, and he accelerated his timetable to retire as chief executive.
    Check out the News Forum for the latest news with a Micechat twist!



    Do you MiceChat?
    Help support the site you love:
    -Visit the MiceChat store
    Make a donation with one of the boxes at the bottom of the page

    DMCA for life, yo.
    MCDA- Bringin' sexyback, one pound at a time.

Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X