Please log in. To view all of our exciting discussions about Disney and other theme parks worldwide, please log in orSign Up Now! Happy Chatting!
Your Assistance Please
We need your help to battle spammers and also to keep our community user friendly.
PLEASE BE KIND TO OTHERS - Refrain from personal attacks. Avoid politics and harsh language whenever possible. If someone is violating our simple rules, DO NOT confront them, simply report the post.
STOP SPAMMERS - Report the post. DO NOT respond to them.
2017 is a year of renewal for us, we have lots of exciting changes on the way for you, but we don't have time to deal with trolls and spammers. If you find yourself suspended and need to plead your case, you will need to do so after your suspension. We are happy to address your concerns if you made a simple mistake. However, please note that those with a history of bad behavior and pushing our rules to the limit will not be given the courtesy of a reply.
MiceChat offers a number of ways for you to communicate and get involved. We offer Facebook Groups and Pages, Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest accounts. We have a front page filled with amazing content. We offer weekly meetups in the parks. Meets and events all over the world. Podcasts and videos. And we continue to maintain forums for your posting convenience. But with all those options, we can't be everywhere all the time. We need YOUR help. Please don't poke the trolls. Report posts and leave reputation. We'll do our best to keep the forums clean and active, but we can't do so without your help.
Thank you for your support folks, it's going to be a really fantastic year in the MiceChat world.
I don't know about the specific legal stuff. I do remember that as she did her PR interviews for the last book she mentioned the possibility of doing a Harry Potter encyclopedia herself. Now this guy's going to publish one? Seems fishy. Although, his website is basically an entire HP encyclopedia on the web instead of in book form.
chris columbus, the director of the first harry potter movie, should be investigated for a little copyright infringement of his own.
case in point: Disney's Animated classic The Sword In The Stone.
the character of (nicknamed) wart? specifically the cover of the dvd shows him in a red outfit and a yellow scarf. well, if you look at the first harry potter movie essentially when he gets to hoggwarts and shortly after he is given his "sorting" by the sorting hat, the uniform that he is given bears a striking resemblance to the one (nicknamed) wart is wearing (sans the gryffendor insignia).
well, anyhow another :ot: thought: I will be following up this thought with a letter to the legal department at the disney company. just thought I would drop this thought into the pot and let you all look at it first.
With all the books analyzing Potter from different perspectives and speculating on the final book... all the Wizard Rockers making albums that sold at Borders... I think it's clear JKR welcomes her fans to create art inspired by her world.
But that's not the case with the Lexicon. It's a great resource, to the point where it got a website award from JKR some years back (something she now regrets). But once you put something like that in print, for profit, and don't add any sort of commentary... I think JKR is right to sue, whether or not she writes an encyclopedia herself. It's the equivalent of Wikipedia selling its Potter articles in book form.
In music, there's something called a "compulsory license" where someone can record and distribute a new interpretation of a song and just pay a royalty without engaging in time-consuming negotiations. The rates are set high, but not impossibly so, in order that there would be an incentive to come to terms, but not an absolute bar to performance if there were no meeting of minds. There is, however, no such construct for textual materials.
There is no question that JKR is the creator of HP's world, and all due credit is due to her. On the other hand, there is no indication that Vander Ark intends any disrespect -- he merely wishes to provide a cross-reference to the works.
The courtroom will settle the question of merits according to law, but elevating this dispute to litigation does nothing toward what is right. In a perfect world, JKR and VA could produce competing works -- JKR's with more from the original inspiration, and VA more from diligence.....or they could collaborate.....and the market could sort things out by worth.